Its not to late to have your say. CLICK HERE.

UCDA Member & Hunter Survey Report 2026
New Zealand Deerstalkers Association — Wanaka Branch

Upper Clutha
Deerstalkers

Member & Hunter Community Survey — Results Report 2026
Updated Report — Full Dataset, 43 Responses
43
Total Responses
Up from 23 in the interim results
38
Current Members
88% of respondents, plus 5 lapsed members
7.3/10
Avg Satisfaction
Member satisfaction score

This report presents the full results of the Upper Clutha Deerstalkers' member and community survey, now closed with 43 responses — nearly double the 23-response interim dataset reported earlier. Of these, 38 are current members and 5 are lapsed members who provided valuable re-engagement insight. No non-member hunters responded in this round.

The findings reconfirm, with a much larger sample, the same clear priority: a local shooting range. When members ranked their own priorities directly, the range tied with land access & advocacy for first place — both well ahead of every other option. Support for the club investing in a range is close to unanimous (93%). Communication remains a genuine strength, and a healthy pool of willing volunteers is ready to be put to work. The club has a solid foundation and a clear mandate for where to focus next.

1
Survey Respondents
Who Responded
Age Distribution
Age groups: 25-34: 4, 35-49: 15, 50-64: 13, 65+: 11.
Hunting Frequency (times per year)
Frequency: 1-2 times: 6, 3-5 times: 16, 6-10 times: 8, 10+ times: 13.

A broader, more middle-aged sample than the interim results. With the fuller dataset, 35–49 year olds are now the largest single bracket (15), followed by 50–64 (13) and 65+ (11). Only four respondents are aged 25–34 and none under 25 — the club's engagement of younger hunters remains its most immediate demographic challenge. Activity levels are strong throughout: nearly half the membership hunts 6+ times a year, and 13 hunt 10 or more times a year.


Membership Status
Status: Current member 38, Lapsed member 5.
Membership Duration (current members)
Tenure: Less than 1 year: 4, 1-3 years: 16, 4-10 years: 11, More than 10 years: 7.

Of the 43 respondents, 38 (88%) are current members and 5 (12%) are lapsed members — no first-time, never-joined hunters responded this round. Among current members, 1–3 years' tenure is the single largest group (16), suggesting a strong recent intake alongside a solid core of longer-standing members (7 with more than 10 years). See Section 8 for what the lapsed members told us.

2
Hunting Profile
Species & Activity
Top Species Hunted (or would like to hunt)
Species: Red deer 42, Fallow deer 34, Goats 21, Himalayan Tahr 18, Rabbits 17, Pigs 13, Chamois 12, Wallabies 10, Goose 10, Hares 9, Game birds 8, Ducks 8, Whitetail deer 8.

Red deer (42 of 43) and fallow deer (34) dominate, as expected for the Upper Clutha region, with goats, Himalayan tahr and rabbits forming a strong second tier. A long tail of species — chamois, wallabies, waterfowl, whitetail, sika, wapiti, sambar, even feral cats — confirms members hunt across a genuinely wide range of terrain and seasons. This breadth still supports the case for varied club competitions and events that appeal across skill levels and interests.

3
Member Feedback
Membership Satisfaction
7.3/10
Overall Satisfaction
7.7/10
Likelihood to Recommend
100%
Rated Good or Excellent
For committee communication
Communication Quality
Communication: Excellent 19, Good 19.
Preferred Channels
Channels: Email 37, Monthly meetings 18, WhatsApp 14, Club website 12, Social media 6, SMS 2.

Email newsletter remains king. 37 of 38 current members chose it as a preferred channel — the Hindsight newsletter is, by a wide margin, the club's most effective communication tool. Communication is rated Good or Excellent by every single respondent, an even split between the two. Monthly meetings and WhatsApp are strong secondary channels. Note: satisfaction (7.3) and recommend (7.7) have eased slightly from the interim 23-response snapshot (7.7 / 7.9) now that a larger, more representative sample is in — still solidly positive, but worth watching.

4
⚠ The Club's #1 Priority
The Shooting Range

The larger dataset only strengthens this finding. The lack of a local shooting range is raised throughout the survey — as a barrier, a reason members join or don't rejoin, and the single most common answer to "what should the club improve." When members directly ranked their priorities (Section 5), the range tied for first place. 93% of all respondents support the club investing in one.

Current Zeroing Situation (members)
Situation: Inconvenient 16, Real problem 16, Manage fine 6.
Importance of a Local Range (all respondents)
Importance: Essential 22, Very important 9, Moderately important 9, Low importance 3.
Support for Club Investment in a Range
Support: Strongly support 24, Support worth pursuing 16, Neutral 3.

93% support (40 of 43). 24 respondents strongly support and 16 support the club investing time, funds and grant applications into establishing a local range; only 3 are neutral, and nobody is opposed. This is as close to unanimous as a survey result gets.

Most Wanted Range Features
Features: 100m minimum 37, Unsupervised key access 33, All calibres 23, Vehicle access 22, Target frames 22, Covered bench 21, Long range 20, Formal safety procedures 14.
How Far Would Members Travel?
Distance: Up to 10km: 10, Up to 30km: 17, Up to 60km: 8, Distance doesn't matter: 8.
How Often Would Members Use a Range?
Usage: Weekly 3, Monthly or more 23, Few times per year 14, Once a year or less 1, Unlikely 2.

One lead worth chasing, one worth clarifying: A member suggested exploring a partnership with "the guy who has the range in Cardrona" — but another respondent specifically flagged this operation is not Real Guns, correcting an assumption from the earlier report. Several members also currently zero at the Cardrona range but describe it as busy and expensive for regular social use. Separately, a member again noted the club has sufficient funds to consider leasing land from a private landowner. Access incidents at Spotts Creek and the Cardrona Valley Road entrance to The Stacks were reported again — both useful for DOC advocacy (Section 5).

5
Access & Advocacy
Land Access & Committee Priorities
8
Access Issues Reported
In the last 2 years, by members
21%
Of Members
Experienced restrictions
29
Landowner Relationships
Top-ranked advocacy priority
Reported Access Incidents
#Incident Description
1Spotts Creek — access restriction
2Hunter Valley — 4WD access restricted
3Cardrona Valley Road entrance to The Stacks — access restricted
4Hunter Valley and Pisa Range — difficult to access; getting into The Stack by foot is "very tricky"
5Access to The Stack from the Cardrona side
6DOC blocks with firearm carriage restrictions through private land
7Cannot carry rifle on access tracks in the Lindis and up the true arm at Lake Hawea
8"Too many to list" (member comment)
Advocacy Priorities — Areas to Prioritise (members, select all)
Advocacy: Private landowners 29, Marginal strips 28, DOC engagement 27, High country access 21, Unformed legal roads 17, National NZDA advocacy 17, Helicopter access 9.
Committee Focus Areas — Ranked by Members (1 = highest priority)
Average rank (1=top priority, 9=lowest): Local shooting range 2.58, Land access and advocacy 2.58, Club events and social activities 3.53, Skills safety training and workshops 4.66, Youth and new member development 5.53, Member communications 5.95, Club facilities and equipment 6.03, Conservation and habitat projects 6.32, Competitions and trophy recognition 7.84.

When forced to rank rather than just rate, members are unambiguous. The local shooting range and land access & advocacy tie for first priority (average rank 2.58 of 9), well clear of club events (3.53) in third. Competitions and trophy recognition rank dead last (7.84) — consistent with the activity ratings in Section 6. Building relationships with private landowners is the single most-selected advocacy focus (29 of 38 members), directly relevant to both the range and clubhouse search. One member also raised opposition to WARO and the roar ballot system not prioritising local hunters — worth noting for national advocacy positioning.

6
Engagement
Activities & Events
Activity Interest Ratings (avg out of 5, current members)
Ratings: Access to a local shooting range 4.42, Advocacy with DOC and local government 4.32, Organised club hunts and trips 3.76, Local hunting knowledge sharing 3.76, Member-only access to private properties 3.74, Conservation and pest control activities 3.71, Hunting skills workshops 3.45, Youth junior mentoring programmes 3.45, Guest speakers and educational evenings 3.42, Firearms safety and handling courses 3.26, Social events and club dinners 3.18, Access to club equipment 2.95, Trophy and game competitions 2.53.

The shooting range and DOC advocacy are the clear top two at 4.42 and 4.32 out of 5, consistent with the ranking exercise in Section 5. Club hunts, local knowledge sharing, private property access and conservation work form a solid middle tier (all around 3.7–3.8). Trophy and game competitions again rate lowest (2.53) — members value participation and access over formal competition. Guest speakers and educational evenings hold up well (3.42) — continue investing in quality speakers at meetings.

Event Attendance Frequency (members)
Attendance: Regularly 20, Occasionally 10, Rarely 4, Don't attend - membership only 4.
Barriers to Attending More Often
Barriers: Timing clashes 14, Distance 2, Noise at venue 1, Content not relevant 1.

Timing clashes remain the dominant barrier — 14 members cited work and family conflicts, well ahead of distance (2). One member specifically raised hearing difficulty at the current venue: "I am probably not the only member with hearing damage — the club meetings are very hard to follow because of the background noise. It puts me off attending." Two members separately suggested changing the meeting night or start time (e.g. starting at 6pm). Both the noise issue and the timing clashes point toward the same fix already flagged by members: a dedicated clubhouse and more flexible scheduling.

7
Member Involvement
Volunteering & Participation
Willingness to Volunteer (members)
Volunteering: Maybe 11, No 10, Yes specific tasks 9, Yes committee role 8.
17
Willing to Help
Specific tasks or committee role
11
Said Maybe
Depending on what's involved

A strong volunteer base is available. 17 of 38 members (45%) are ready to help right now with tasks or committee roles, and a further 11 are open to it depending on what's involved. That's 28 members — nearly three-quarters of the membership — who aren't a flat "no." Don't wait for them to come forward — reach out directly with a specific ask. A working group for the range project would be an ideal starting point to engage these members immediately.

8
A Re-Engagement Opportunity
What Lapsed Members Told Us

New in this dataset: 5 of the 43 respondents are lapsed members. It's a small sample, but every one of them still knows the club exists, and their reasons for not rejoining are practical rather than a loss of interest — which makes them a realistic, low-cost source of new membership.

Why They Haven't Rejoined
Reasons: Lapsed, never got around to rejoining 5, Prefer to hunt independently 1, No local shooting range or facilities 1.
What Would Motivate Them to (Re)join
Motivators: Access to private land or hunting areas 4, Access to a local shooting range 3, Youth programmes for family 2, Lower fees or trial membership 2, Local knowledge and trip reports 2, Strong local hunting community 1, Skills and training workshops 1.

All five lapsed respondents simply "never got around to rejoining" — there is no expressed dissatisfaction driving the lapse. Access to private land, a local shooting range, youth programmes and lower/trial membership fees are the clearest levers to bring them back. In their own words: "More ladies hunts" and "Affordable gun range for zeroing and practicing." Of the five, two said a range alone would be a significant factor (one said it would be enough on its own) — reinforcing that the range investment (Section 4) doubles as a recruitment tool, not just a member benefit. A simple, low-effort re-engagement email or phone call to lapsed members is likely to convert several of them.

9
Member Voices
What Members Said
What the Club Does Well

"Runs a great HUNTS Course each year. Organises good club hunts. Keeps members informed of important matters relating to all hunting activities."

"Good communication. Provides a range of activity for all members according to experience and skill level."

"Club hunts, especially Wallaby hunts & rekindling the excellent past relationship we had with DOC."

"Gives us hunters a united voice."

"Good monthly meetings with interesting guests and information — love the raffles!"

"Hunts Course & access to a shooting range when it had it, on the Wanaka–Lake Hawea highway."

"Keeping in touch with members. Liked the boot sale. The game chiller is great."

"HUNTS, advocacy, camaraderie, skills training and hunting opportunities."

Most Important Improvement

"The town is growing but our numbers are stagnant. There's so many hunters in our town but they don't see value in the NZDA. A range would fix that — there's plenty of money in the account to lease land off a landowner."

"Obtain a shooting range, which already seems to be a focus based on this survey. New young members want to fire rifles — visit the Real Guns range as evidence. Will encourage new membership and licence holders."

"Try again to involve more young people in participating fully in the club's activities. Connect more with the wider community to encourage new members and educate the public about our conservation and pest control work."

"Club rooms, or a place without distractions during our meetings."

"Push back on things that are wrecking local hunting — e.g. WARO, the roar ballot system not prioritising locals."

"Work on better hunting areas with DOC, with no helicopter hunting in some local valleys, to improve hunting opportunities."

"Consider the timing of club evenings — mix up the days of the week and see if it changes attendance."

"Look at doing more hunts or mini awards, e.g. most rabbits shot. Quarterly hunts would bring the morale up."

New Ideas from Members

"Worth trying another Hunting Competition and Wild Foods Dinner."

"Junior events or hunts — kids hunting, max 16 kids on the ballot form."

"Teen hunts / workshops."  ·  "Youth hunts courses."

"Building an app for members of the Upper Clutha Deerstalkers community — for education, updates, events, calendar reminders, a group chat, etc."

"Assistance to existing and new licence holders in renewals and obtaining a licence — numbers are dropping drastically according to COLFO."

"A buy/sell page — or is there already one somewhere?"

10
Survey Findings & Next Steps
Findings and Outcomes
Shooting Range
93% of respondents (40 of 43) support the club investing time, funds and grant applications in a range.
Outcome: Committee to confirm the range as the top project for the coming year and stand up a working group.
When forced to rank priorities directly, members placed the range joint #1 (avg rank 2.58 of 9).
Outcome: Committee to reflect this prioritisation in the next AGM agenda and forward planning.
A member flagged a possible lead: the operator of the Cardrona range (confirmed NOT Real Guns).
Outcome: Committee to follow up with this contact to establish what partnership or access might be possible.
A member noted the club holds sufficient funds to consider leasing land from a private landowner.
Outcome: Committee/treasurer to review funds available for a lease or as grant co-funding.
Club House
37% of members (14 of 38) said meeting days/times clash with work or family commitments.
Outcome: Committee to discuss alternative meeting nights/times, potentially via a member vote or poll on the website.
Members reported venue noise makes meetings hard to follow and puts some off attending.
Outcome: Committee to re-evaluate previously considered locations in light of this feedback.
Land Access & Advocacy
Building relationships with private landowners is the top-ranked advocacy priority (29 of 38 members).
Outcome: Committee to consider a dedicated landowner-relations role.
21% of members (8 of 38) reported access restrictions in the last 2 years — Spotts Creek, Cardrona Valley Rd/The Stacks, Hunter Valley/Pisa Range, Lindis and Lake Hawea tracks, and DOC firearm-carriage blocks.
Outcome: Committee to log reported incidents and raise formally with DOC/QLDC.
One member raised WARO and the roar ballot system not prioritising local hunters.
Outcome: Committee to consider raising this with national NZDA.
Lapsed Members
All 5 lapsed respondents still know the club exists; none cited dissatisfaction, only "never got around to it."
Outcome: Committee to discuss alternative ways to remind/encourage members not to let their membership slip.
Their top motivators to rejoin: access to private land, a local range, youth programmes, and lower/trial fees.
Outcome: Committee to focus on these items, based on this indicated prioritisation.
Youth & Junior Programmes
Repeated requests for junior/teen hunts and a capped kids' ballot hunt (e.g. max 16 kids).
Outcome: Committee to consider a youth-programme lead/volunteer role and a first junior hunt date.
Club Hunts & Events
Quarterly hunts, a Wild Foods Dinner, mini-game competitions and more ladies' hunts were all specifically requested.
Outcome: Committee to consider building a 12-month events calendar around these formats.
Communication
97% of members (37 of 38) prefer the email newsletter; comms rated Good or Excellent by 100%.
Outcome: Committee to maintain the newsletter cadence and include range/clubhouse progress updates each issue.
Two different website addresses appeared in responses (www.ucda.org vs www.ucda.org.nz).
Outcome: Committee to confirm the correct URL and standardise it across all club communications.
Other Ideas Raised
A member app for events, calendar reminders and group chat was suggested; another asked for a buy/sell page.
Outcome: Committee to better remind/advertise to members that a website events calendar and WhatsApp hunt group chats already exist, and encourage members to speak up if they feel this doesn't already cover what they need.
A member raised declining licence-holder numbers (per COLFO) and asked for renewal/licensing assistance.
Outcome: Committee to consider a licensing info session at the HUNTS Course or AGM.
Volunteering
45% of members (17 of 38) are ready to help now with specific tasks or a committee role; a further 29% (11) said maybe. Responses were anonymous, so these members can't be identified individually.
Outcome: Committee to encourage members to put their hand up and offer skills or help on specific tasks — without needing to become a full committee member.